USSE vs. COMT
USSE (Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, USSE returned 30.78% vs 45.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. USSE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
USSE vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSE achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return.
USSE
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 37.50%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
USSE vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF | 21.52% | 2.50% | 24.49% | 5.01% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 37.50% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSE and COMT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between USSE and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USSE vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USSE
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USSE
COMT
-
Financial Services
USSE
COMT
Industrials
USSE
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
USSE
COMT
-
Communication Services
USSE
COMT
-
Energy
USSE
COMT
-
Healthcare
USSE
COMT
-
Basic Materials
USSE
-
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
USSE
-
COMT
-
Real Estate
USSE
-
COMT
-
Utilities
USSE
-
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSE vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
USSE
COMT
USSE vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 5.70 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 13.42 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.14 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.20 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
USSE vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSE drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSE and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.36% | -51.89% | +29.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -8.02% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.30% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -24.06% | +20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.40% | -0.85% |
Volatility
USSE vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) is 4.16%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that USSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 7.46% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 18.88% | -8.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 21.36% | -6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 21.07% | -4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 18.89% | -2.64% |
USSE vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSE vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
USSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.63% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
USSE Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USSE and COMT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to USSE (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSE dropped -22.36% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 45.51% vs 30.78% for USSE. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, USSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 45.51% return vs 30.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for USSE.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 0.00% for USSE.
USSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Segall Bryant & Hamill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for USSE and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USSE and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer