PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. SCMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.


USRT

1D
0.94%
1M
5.04%
YTD
17.79%
6M
17.95%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
6.67%

SCMB

1D
0.00%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USRT vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
17.79%2.44%8.58%13.64%7.85%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
1.07%3.78%0.91%5.86%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and SCMB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMB
SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USRT vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USRTSCMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.08

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

6.87

+0.92

USRT vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USRT vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and SCMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTSCMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-6.13%

-63.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-2.92%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-5.57%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-1.32%

-11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

0.88%

+1.61%

Volatility

USRT vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 0.96%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTSCMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

0.96%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

2.16%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

2.89%

+10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

4.15%

+14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

4.15%

+17.15%

USRT vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USRT vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than SCMB's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
3.54%3.36%3.34%3.10%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.56%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


USRT and SCMB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USRT has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to SCMB (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

On 3-year performance, USRT leads with 12.69% vs 3.26% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USRT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USRT.

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 2.56% for USRT.

USRT is categorized as REIT, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.03% for SCMB.

SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and SCMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer