PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 6.28%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


USRT

1D
-1.12%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
13.82%
6M
14.38%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
6.28%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USRT vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
13.82%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and SCHP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010

0.12

The correlation between USRT and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USRT vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USRT
SCHP

Real Estate

99.4%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

USRT
99.4%
SCHP

-

Financial Services

USRT
0.1%
SCHP
0.0%

Basic Materials

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Communication Services

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

USRT

-

SCHP
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Energy

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Healthcare

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Industrials

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Technology

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Utilities

USRT

-

SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USRT vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USRTSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.50

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

7.59

-1.28

USRT vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USRTSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.17

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.45

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.50

-0.31

Drawdowns

USRT vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.91%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.91%

-14.26%

-55.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-1.93%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-4.48%

-14.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-14.26%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-14.26%

-30.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-0.89%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-3.93%

-9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

0.63%

+1.86%

Volatility

USRT vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

1.00%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

2.24%

+7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

3.29%

+10.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

6.12%

+12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

5.59%

+15.70%

USRT vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USRT vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.65%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


USRT and SCHP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USRT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.91% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, USRT leads with 6.28% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USRT has performed better with a 6.28% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USRT.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 2.65% for USRT.

USRT is categorized as REIT, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.03% for SCHP.

SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer