USRT vs. PIT
USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USRT is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. USRT is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USRT returned 13.59%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USRT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
USRT vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.
USRT
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
PIT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 26.74%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USRT vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 15.99% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | 0.06% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 27.31% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and PIT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.03 |
The correlation between USRT and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USRT vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
USRT
PIT
USRT vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USRT | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.74 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 10.88 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USRT vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USRT | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -14.05% | -55.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -14.05% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -14.05% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -14.05% | +12.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -4.07% | -8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.59% | -1.09% |
Volatility
USRT vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 4.67%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USRT | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.67% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 19.36% | -9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 21.66% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 17.50% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 17.50% | +3.83% |
USRT vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
USRT vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.00% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.60% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USRT and PIT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USRT has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PIT (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs PIT's -14.05%.
On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 13.59% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 2.60% for USRT.
USRT is categorized as REIT, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USRT and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer