USRT vs. FAAR
USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USRT is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. USRT is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, USRT returned 6.39%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for FAAR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USRT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
USRT vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return. Over the past 10 years, USRT has outperformed FAAR with an annualized return of 6.39%, while FAAR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.
USRT
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
USRT vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 15.99% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | 12.34% | 8.60% | -1.28% | -9.17% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between USRT and FAAR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USRT vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
USRT
FAAR
USRT vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USRT | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 4.75 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 14.70 | -7.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USRT vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.92%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USRT | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.92% | -18.03% | -51.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -5.68% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -11.54% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.03% | -18.03% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | -18.03% | -26.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -5.43% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -7.82% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.89% | +0.61% |
Volatility
USRT vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.47%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USRT | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 2.47% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 9.68% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 13.37% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 12.95% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 11.53% | +9.80% |
USRT vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
USRT vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.60% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USRT and FAAR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USRT has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to FAAR (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.92% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 10-year performance, USRT leads with 6.39% vs 4.79% for FAAR. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USRT has performed better with a 6.39% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 2.60% for USRT.
USRT is categorized as REIT, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USRT and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer