PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USPA.L vs. XDWE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USPA.L is traded in USD, while XDWE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDWE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USPA.L achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDWE.L's 12.03% return.


USPA.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.06%
6M
7.17%
YTD
7.42%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*

XDWE.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.21%
6M
8.22%
YTD
12.03%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
USPA.L
Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
7.42%15.76%26.74%30.46%-22.10%32.21%16.58%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
12.03%11.79%12.16%13.47%-11.89%30.18%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between USPA.L and XDWE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.77

The correlation between USPA.L and XDWE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USPA.L
USPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
USPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
USPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USPA.LXDWE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.93

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

10.67

-3.91

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USPA.L and XDWE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USPA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.78%, smaller than the maximum XDWE.L drawdown of -98.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPA.L and XDWE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USPA.LXDWE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.78%

-98.45%

+70.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-7.08%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-19.08%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-21.62%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.14%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-4.99%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.95%

+0.85%

Volatility

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) at 2.26%. This indicates that USPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USPA.LXDWE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.26%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

7.16%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

10.24%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

20.58%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

19.36%

-2.88%

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USPA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USPA.L vs. XDWE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USPA.L nor XDWE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USPA.L and XDWE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.

USPA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG Index, while XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USPA.L and 0.20% for XDWE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USPA.L and XDWE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer