PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USPA.L vs. FLXB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (USPA.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USPA.L achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than FLXB.L's 17.17% return.


USPA.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.65%
6M
7.59%
YTD
7.03%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*

FLXB.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.17%
6M
13.24%
YTD
17.17%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
USPA.L
Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF
7.03%15.76%26.74%30.46%-22.10%32.21%16.58%
FLXB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
17.17%45.49%-27.92%33.43%10.93%-16.59%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between USPA.L and FLXB.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USPA.L
USPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
USPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXB.L
FLXB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FLXB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (USPA.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USPA.LFLXB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.21

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

5.73

+0.88

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the FLXB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USPA.L and FLXB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USPA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.78%, smaller than the maximum FLXB.L drawdown of -56.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPA.L and FLXB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USPA.LFLXB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.78%

-56.54%

+28.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-17.78%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-28.79%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-32.17%

+4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-12.54%

+11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-18.96%

+12.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

6.89%

-4.09%

Volatility

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (USPA.L) is 3.42%, while Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.L) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that USPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USPA.LFLXB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

6.41%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

18.27%

-8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

23.82%

-11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

27.18%

-10.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

32.03%

-15.55%

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USPA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXB.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USPA.L vs. FLXB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USPA.L nor FLXB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USPA.L and FLXB.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLXB.L.

USPA.L tracks Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF, while FLXB.L tracks Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USPA.L and 0.19% for FLXB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USPA.L and FLXB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer