PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USOI vs. BTOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USOI vs. BTOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) and iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USOI achieves a 30.79% return, which is significantly higher than BTOT's 0.51% return.


USOI

1D
0.13%
1M
-3.85%
6M
27.39%
YTD
30.79%
1Y
25.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTOT

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.29%
6M
0.13%
YTD
0.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USOI vs. BTOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USOI and BTOT is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USOI vs. BTOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BTOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USOI vs. BTOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) and iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USOIBTOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

USOI vs. BTOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USOI vs. BTOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USOI drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, which is greater than BTOT's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USOI and BTOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USOIBTOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.54%

-2.36%

-21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.79%

-1.07%

-14.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-0.80%

-6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

Volatility

USOI vs. BTOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USOIBTOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.95%

3.66%

+21.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.54%

3.66%

+19.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

3.66%

+19.88%

USOI vs. BTOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USOI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BTOT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

USOI vs. BTOT - Dividend Comparison

USOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.80%, more than BTOT's 2.50% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


USOI and BTOT have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.

USOI has the higher dividend yield at 45.80%, compared with 2.50% for BTOT.

USOI is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BTOT is Total Bond Market. USOI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index, while BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for USOI and 0.09% for BTOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USOI and BTOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer