USNZ vs. XAIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USNZ (Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF) and XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USNZ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XAIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USNZ returned 24.01% vs 52.90% for XAIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USNZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAIX.

Performance

USNZ vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNZ achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX's 30.66% return.

USNZ

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 7.73%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAIX

• 1D: -4.93%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 30.66%
• 6M: 30.48%
• 1Y: 52.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNZ vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
USNZ Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF	7.73%	17.76%	6.02%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	30.66%	29.05%	15.21%

Correlation

The correlation between USNZ and XAIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.88

The correlation between USNZ and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

USNZ vs. XAIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USNZ	XAIX
Technology	45.3%	71.7%
Communication Services	12.5%	14.1%
Healthcare	10.8%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	8.9%
Financial Services	9.8%	5.2%
Industrials	3.2%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	0.0%
Real Estate	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	0.0%
Utilities	1.1%	0.0%
Energy	0.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

USNZ vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNZ

USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 54
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNZ vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USNZ	XAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.21	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.79	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.79	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	12.74	-3.43

USNZ vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNZ and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USNZ vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNZ drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum XAIX drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNZ and XAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNZ	XAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-23.95%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-14.01%	+2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	-8.01%	+4.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-3.59%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	4.16%	-1.58%

Volatility

USNZ vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) is 5.26%, while Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that USNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNZ	XAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	14.31%	-9.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	21.18%	-10.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	24.04%	-10.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	24.71%	-8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	24.71%	-8.01%

USNZ vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNZ vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

USNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than XAIX's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
USNZ Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF	0.98%	1.02%	1.14%	1.19%	0.80%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.39%	0.54%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNZ and XAIX in my portfolio?

USNZ and XAIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNZ or XAIX?

XAIX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to USNZ (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNZ dropped -19.16% vs XAIX's -23.95%.

Which ETF is better, USNZ or XAIX?

On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 52.90% vs 24.01% for USNZ. On fees, USNZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USNZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USNZ or XAIX?

Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 52.90% return vs 24.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USNZ or XAIX?

USNZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USNZ or XAIX?

USNZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.39% for XAIX.

What is the main difference between USNZ and XAIX?

USNZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XAIX is Technology Equities. USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USNZ and 0.35% for XAIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.