USNQX vs. FZAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX).
USNQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Oct 27, 2000. FZAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013.
Performance
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | -5.93% | 20.52% | 25.42% | 54.46% | -32.71% | 26.82% | 48.31% | 38.86% | -0.43% | 32.30% |
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z | -5.39% | 14.68% | 18.15% | 35.80% | -24.36% | 23.09% | 43.86% | 35.68% | 0.36% | 35.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USNQX achieves a -5.93% return, which is significantly lower than FZAFX's -5.39% return. Over the past 10 years, USNQX has outperformed FZAFX with an annualized return of 18.56%, while FZAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.19% annualized return.
USNQX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
FZAFX
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USNQX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FZAFX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USNQX vs. FZAFX — Risk / Return Rank
USNQX
FZAFX
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USNQX | FZAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.84 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.32 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.42 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 5.02 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USNQX | FZAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.84 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.78 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.76 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between USNQX and FZAFX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Dividend Comparison
USNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FZAFX's 0.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | 3.21% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.60% | 4.13% | 4.48% | 1.53% | 0.88% | 0.69% | 1.97% | 0.50% | 2.73% |
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z | 0.54% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 1.93% | 11.39% | 10.84% | 9.53% | 6.38% | 11.66% | 5.87% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USNQX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FZAFX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNQX and FZAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USNQX | FZAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.24% | -31.13% | -45.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.72% | -12.75% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.95% | -29.73% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | -31.13% | -5.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -8.78% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -5.84% | -21.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.62% | -0.18% |
Volatility
USNQX vs. FZAFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) is 6.56%, while Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that USNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USNQX | FZAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 7.78% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 13.34% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 21.83% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 20.59% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 20.70% | +1.91% |