FZAFX vs. VONG

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 9.48%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FZAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.08%. This indicates that FZAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.