USNQX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
USNQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Oct 27, 2000. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | -5.93% | 20.52% | 25.42% | 54.46% | -32.71% | 26.82% | 48.31% | 38.86% | -0.43% | 32.30% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -6.10% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with USNQX having a -5.93% return and CTCAX slightly lower at -6.10%. Over the past 10 years, USNQX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 18.56%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return.
USNQX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USNQX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USNQX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
USNQX
CTCAX
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USNQX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.84 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.30 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 8.07 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USNQX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.84 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.71 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between USNQX and CTCAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
USNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than CTCAX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | 3.21% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.60% | 4.13% | 4.48% | 1.53% | 0.88% | 0.69% | 1.97% | 0.50% | 2.73% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.50% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USNQX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNQX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USNQX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.24% | -61.04% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.72% | -14.43% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.95% | -39.55% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | -39.55% | +2.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -10.51% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -10.75% | -16.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 4.12% | -0.68% |
Volatility
USNQX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) is 6.56%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that USNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USNQX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 8.94% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 16.85% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 27.31% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 25.88% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 24.70% | -2.09% |