CTCAX vs. ACN
CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) is Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia, while ACN (Accenture plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CTCAX returned 23.98%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for ACN. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CTCAX vs. ACN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTCAX achieves a 26.44% return, which is significantly higher than ACN's -47.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CTCAX has outperformed ACN with an annualized return of 23.98%, while ACN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.
CTCAX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- YTD
- 26.44%
- 1Y
- 43.25%
- 3Y*
- 32.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.93%
- 10Y*
- 23.98%
ACN
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -17.67%
- 6M
- -49.39%
- YTD
- -47.00%
- 1Y
- -49.08%
- 3Y*
- -22.30%
- 5Y*
- -13.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
CTCAX vs. ACN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 26.44% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
ACN Accenture plc | -47.00% | -22.14% | 1.86% | 33.60% | -34.75% | 60.67% | 26.04% | 51.21% | -6.23% | 33.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTCAX and ACN is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CTCAX and ACN shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTCAX vs. ACN — Risk / Return Rank
CTCAX
ACN
CTCAX vs. ACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Accenture plc (ACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTCAX | ACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.77 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | -0.87 | +3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | -1.90 | +12.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTCAX vs. ACN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTCAX drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, smaller than the maximum ACN drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTCAX and ACN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTCAX | ACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.04% | -67.78% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -56.51% | +42.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.67% | -67.78% | +41.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.55% | -67.78% | +28.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.55% | -67.78% | +28.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -63.70% | +59.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -13.05% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 25.89% | -21.67% |
Volatility
CTCAX vs. ACN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) is 12.00%, while Accenture plc (ACN) has a volatility of 24.14%. This indicates that CTCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTCAX | ACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 24.14% | -12.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 37.31% | -16.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.79% | 41.27% | -16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 30.25% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 27.70% | -2.59% |
Dividends
CTCAX vs. ACN - Dividend Comparison
CTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than ACN's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACN Accenture plc | 4.71% | 2.26% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 0.87% | 1.26% | 1.07% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.97% | 2.03% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 2.60% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTCAX and ACN have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACN has higher volatility (24.14%) compared to CTCAX (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTCAX dropped -61.04% vs ACN's -67.78%.
CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTCAX and ACN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer