PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
USMV vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

USMV vs. XIU.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.90%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for XIU.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XIU.TO.

Performance

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USMV is traded in USD, while XIU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XIU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 9.02% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 9.90%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.

USMV

1D
0.43%
1M
1.84%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.34%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
9.90%

XIU.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
2.21%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.35%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF		2.43%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		9.02%35.06%11.31%14.58%-11.93%28.12%7.83%27.04%-14.97%17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and XIU.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.51

The correlation between USMV and XIU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
USMV
XIU.TO

Technology

30.8%
8.8%

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Financial Services

12.4%
39.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
3.2%

Utilities

7.5%
2.6%

Communication Services

5.9%
2.0%

Industrials

5.7%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
4.1%

Energy

3.6%
18.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
13.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.2%

Technology

USMV
30.8%
XIU.TO
8.8%

Healthcare

USMV
12.5%
XIU.TO

-

Financial Services

USMV
12.4%
XIU.TO
39.4%

Consumer Defensive

USMV
10.0%
XIU.TO
3.2%

Utilities

USMV
7.5%
XIU.TO
2.6%

Communication Services

USMV
5.9%
XIU.TO
2.0%

Industrials

USMV
5.7%
XIU.TO
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
XIU.TO
4.1%

Energy

USMV
3.6%
XIU.TO
18.6%

Basic Materials

USMV
2.2%
XIU.TO
13.3%

Real Estate

USMV
2.2%
XIU.TO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Often compared with USMV:
USMV vs. SPLVUSMV vs. SPYUSMV vs. VOOUSMV vs. VFMVUSMV vs. ACWVUSMV vs. QUALUSMV vs. VTI
Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO

Return for Risk

USMV vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

USMVXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.47
2.30

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.72
3.10

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.41

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.64

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

15.59

-13.53

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and XIU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

USMVXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-59.23%

+26.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-8.10%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-12.38%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-24.07%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-40.99%

+7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.86%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-10.95%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.89%

+0.06%

Volatility

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.70%, while iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

USMVXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

4.01%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

10.05%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.56%

12.83%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

14.47%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

16.45%

-1.94%

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USMV vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than XIU.TO's 2.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF		1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.18%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

USMV and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.18% for XIU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer