USMV vs. DMAY
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMV returned 7.45%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DMAY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
USMV vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than DMAY's 4.42% return.
USMV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
USMV vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.65% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 15.25% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and DMAY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and DMAY has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USMV vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
DMAY
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
USMV
DMAY
Healthcare
USMV
DMAY
Financial Services
USMV
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
USMV
DMAY
Utilities
USMV
DMAY
Communication Services
USMV
DMAY
Industrials
USMV
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
DMAY
Energy
USMV
DMAY
Basic Materials
USMV
DMAY
Real Estate
USMV
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
DMAY
USMV vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.60 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 3.73 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 22.76 | -20.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 2.65 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
USMV vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -13.90% | -19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -3.36% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -12.38% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -13.90% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.30% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -2.24% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 0.55% | +1.38% |
Volatility
USMV vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that USMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 0.84% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | 3.74% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50% | 4.73% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 9.02% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 8.43% | +6.08% |
USMV vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMV vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and DMAY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMV has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, USMV leads with 7.45% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMV has performed better with a 7.45% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer