USMV vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USMV is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Over the past year, USMV returned 4.37% vs 47.09% for BLCR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

USMV vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.56% return.

USMV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 2.61%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

BLCR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 47.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	2.65%	7.65%	15.74%	9.86%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.56%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and BLCR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.52

The correlation between USMV and BLCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMV vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USMV	BLCR
Technology	30.8%	35.7%
Healthcare	12.5%	7.6%
Financial Services	12.4%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	-
Utilities	7.5%	1.6%
Communication Services	5.9%	11.0%
Industrials	5.7%	13.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	10.9%
Energy	3.6%	2.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

USMV vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV

USMV Risk / Return Rank: 17
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 87
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USMV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	3.05	-2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	4.02	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.52	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	4.61	-3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	21.86	-19.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USMV vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USMV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	3.05	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.90	-1.03

Drawdowns

USMV vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMV	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-21.29%	-11.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-10.26%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.37%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-2.19%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.16%	-0.23%

Volatility

USMV vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.38%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMV	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	4.45%	-2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.91%	12.24%	-6.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.50%	15.54%	-7.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.35%	17.47%	-5.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.51%	17.47%	-2.96%

USMV vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

USMV vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.53%	1.49%	1.67%	1.82%	1.62%	1.26%	1.81%	1.88%	2.12%	1.77%	2.22%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMV and BLCR in my portfolio?

USMV and BLCR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMV or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to USMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, USMV or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 47.09% vs 4.37% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMV or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 47.09% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMV or BLCR?

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMV or BLCR?

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between USMV and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.