USML vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

USML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USML is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USML returned 7.98% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

USML vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USML achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

USML

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 4.12%
• 6M: 4.82%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 1Y: 7.98%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USML vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	5.93%	9.33%	9.93%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between USML and SBIT is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.23

Return for Risk

USML vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USML

USML Risk / Return Rank: 18
USML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
USML Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
USML Omega Ratio Rank: 17
USML Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
USML Martin Ratio Rank: 20

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USML vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USML	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	1.41	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	2.05	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.25	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.60	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.78	5.92	-4.15

USML vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USML Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USML and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USML vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USML drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	USML	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.34%	-91.35%	+56.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-47.94%	+34.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-77.15%	+75.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-68.83%	+58.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	21.04%	-16.54%

Volatility

USML vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) is 5.03%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that USML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USML	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	22.98%	-17.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	68.89%	-56.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.46%	88.51%	-72.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	96.89%	-72.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.16%	96.89%	-72.73%

USML vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USML and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

USML vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

USML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USML and SBIT in my portfolio?

USML and SBIT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USML or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to USML (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USML dropped -35.34% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, USML or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 7.98% for USML. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, USML has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USML or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USML or SBIT?

USML and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USML or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for USML.

What is the main difference between USML and SBIT?

USML is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. USML tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.