USML.L vs. RS2G.L
USML.L (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A) and RS2G.L (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USML.L returned 5.72%/yr vs 5.87%/yr for RS2G.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USML.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RS2G.L.
Performance
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USML.L is traded in USD, while RS2G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RS2G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USML.L achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly lower than RS2G.L's 16.34% return.
USML.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- —
RS2G.L
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 39.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USML.L Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A | 14.20% | 6.56% | 7.78% | 17.52% | -15.95% | 26.49% | 11.11% | 5.73% |
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 16.34% | 12.43% | 10.00% | 18.40% | -20.84% | 14.26% | 19.38% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between USML.L and RS2G.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between USML.L and RS2G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USML.L
RS2G.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
USML.L
RS2G.L
Industrials
USML.L
RS2G.L
Technology
USML.L
RS2G.L
Consumer Cyclical
USML.L
RS2G.L
Healthcare
USML.L
RS2G.L
Real Estate
USML.L
RS2G.L
Energy
USML.L
RS2G.L
Basic Materials
USML.L
RS2G.L
Communication Services
USML.L
RS2G.L
Consumer Defensive
USML.L
RS2G.L
Utilities
USML.L
RS2G.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USML.L vs. RS2G.L — Risk / Return Rank
USML.L
RS2G.L
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USML.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.65 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 11.94 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USML.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.20 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USML.L drawdown since its inception was -42.69%, roughly equal to the maximum RS2G.L drawdown of -41.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML.L and RS2G.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USML.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.69% | -41.28% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -10.75% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | -28.67% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -32.25% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.16% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -10.01% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 3.29% | -0.52% |
Volatility
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) is 4.79%, while Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that USML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RS2G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USML.L | RS2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 5.79% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 12.77% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 17.88% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 21.73% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 22.02% | +1.80% |
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USML.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than RS2G.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
USML.L vs. RS2G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USML.L nor RS2G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, USML.L and RS2G.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, USML.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USML.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RS2G.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USML.L and 0.35% for RS2G.L.
Find the right allocation for USML.L and RS2G.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer