RS2G.L vs. 500G.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L).
RS2G.L and 500G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RS2G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. 500G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Nov 4, 2021. Both RS2G.L and 500G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS2G.L Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD | 2.79% | 4.55% | 11.87% | 12.47% | -11.37% | 15.31% | 15.83% | 21.59% | -7.91% | 4.60% |
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | -3.13% | 9.44% | 27.44% | 19.89% | -8.86% | 31.35% | 13.81% | 27.01% | 0.05% | 10.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS2G.L achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly higher than 500G.L's -3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RS2G.L has underperformed 500G.L with an annualized return of 10.35%, while 500G.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.
RS2G.L
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
500G.L
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 14.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RS2G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than 500G.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L — Risk / Return Rank
RS2G.L
500G.L
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RS2G.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.95 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.38 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.06 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 7.18 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RS2G.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.95 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.89 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.95 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.99 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between RS2G.L and 500G.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RS2G.L nor 500G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS2G.L drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, which is greater than 500G.L's maximum drawdown of -25.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS2G.L and 500G.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RS2G.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | -25.52% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -10.72% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | -21.12% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -25.52% | -9.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.83% | -4.76% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -3.33% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.04% | +1.03% |
Volatility
RS2G.L vs. 500G.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF USD (RS2G.L) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that RS2G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RS2G.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 3.74% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 8.35% | +4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 15.53% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 14.37% | +5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 15.57% | +5.34% |