USML.L vs. SLYV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV).
USML.L and SLYV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USML.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 29, 2019. SLYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. Both USML.L and SLYV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USML.L or SLYV.
Key characteristics
| USML.L | SLYV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.54% | 13.37% |
| 1Y Return | 37.30% | 36.96% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.75% | 3.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.35% | 9.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.87 | 1.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.84 | 2.39 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.77 | 1.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.67 | 7.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.63% | 4.65% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.64% | 21.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.65% | -61.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.01% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between USML.L and SLYV is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
USML.L vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, USML.L achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 13.37% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USML.L vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USML.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USML.L vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USML.L vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
USML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USML.L Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 2.10% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.66% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% | 7.50% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
USML.L vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USML.L drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML.L and SLYV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USML.L vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) is 6.84%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that USML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.