USMF vs. RUNN
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN).
USMF and RUNN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USMF is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2017. RUNN is an actively managed fund by Running Oak Capital. It was launched on Jun 7, 2023.
Performance
USMF vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USMF vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | -3.32% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 12.81% |
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | -3.39% | 2.30% | 17.16% | 12.05% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with USMF having a -3.32% return and RUNN slightly lower at -3.39%.
USMF
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 0.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- —
RUNN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -5.49%
- 1Y
- -0.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USMF vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USMF vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank
USMF
RUNN
USMF vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMF | RUNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | -0.01 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.19 | 0.11 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.01 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.05 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | 0.15 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMF | RUNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | -0.01 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.70 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and RUNN is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USMF vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USMF vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and RUNN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMF | RUNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -16.83% | -19.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -10.60% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -8.26% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -3.35% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.79% | -1.06% |
Volatility
USMF vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 3.43%, while Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USMF | RUNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 4.34% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 9.86% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 16.68% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 13.88% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 13.88% | +3.20% |