USMF vs. QIDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. USMF is passively managed, while QIDX is actively managed. Over the past year, USMF returned 6.28% vs 11.10% for QIDX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.

Performance

USMF vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than QIDX's 6.98% return.

USMF

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: 6.28%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: —

QIDX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 11.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMF vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund	4.36%	4.58%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	6.98%	8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between USMF and QIDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.84

The correlation between USMF and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USMF vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMF

USMF Risk / Return Rank: 19
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 17
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 23

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 31
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMF vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USMF	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	1.02	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	1.52	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.18	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	1.61	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.93	5.31	-2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USMF vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMF and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USMF	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58	1.02	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.75	-0.13

Drawdowns

USMF vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and QIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMF	QIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-14.99%	-21.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-6.92%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.44%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-2.30%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	2.10%	+0.05%

Volatility

USMF vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 2.30%, while Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMF	QIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	2.87%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	8.31%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	10.98%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.27%	14.60%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	14.60%	+2.37%

USMF vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

USMF vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than QIDX's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.86%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund	1.32%	1.37%	1.22%	1.33%	1.74%	1.42%	1.34%	1.38%	1.45%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMF and QIDX in my portfolio?

USMF and QIDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMF or QIDX?

QIDX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to USMF (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

Which ETF is better, USMF or QIDX?

On 1-year performance, QIDX leads with 11.10% vs 6.28% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMF or QIDX?

Over the 1-year period, QIDX has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMF or QIDX?

USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMF or QIDX?

USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.86% for QIDX.

What is the main difference between USMF and QIDX?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.50% for QIDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.