USMF vs. MOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMF returned 7.67%/yr vs -0.70%/yr for MOO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.

Performance

USMF vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 10.10% return.

USMF

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: 6.28%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: -0.70%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMF vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund	4.36%	4.60%	19.65%	13.47%	-8.82%	21.26%	12.01%	24.06%	-4.72%	11.27%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	10.10%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-8.10%	23.99%	14.59%	22.29%	-6.03%	12.28%

Correlation

The correlation between USMF and MOO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between USMF and MOO has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USMF vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USMF	MOO
Technology	35.6%	-
Financial Services	11.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	-
Communication Services	10.3%	-
Healthcare	9.3%	15.4%
Industrials	7.8%	20.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	37.9%
Energy	4.1%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Utilities	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.9%	26.2%

Return for Risk

USMF vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMF

USMF Risk / Return Rank: 19
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 17
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 23

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMF vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USMF	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	0.95	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	1.43	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.17	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	1.55	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.93	3.88	-0.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USMF vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMF and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USMF	MOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58	0.95	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	-0.04	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.22	+0.40

Drawdowns

USMF vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMF	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-69.53%	+33.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-8.45%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	-26.83%	+11.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.10%	-39.52%	+21.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-17.50%	+16.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-16.97%	+12.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	3.37%	-1.22%

Volatility

USMF vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 2.30%, while VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMF	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	4.08%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	10.57%	-3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	13.88%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.27%	17.12%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	18.19%	-1.22%

USMF vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

USMF vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MOO's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.24%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund	1.32%	1.37%	1.22%	1.33%	1.74%	1.42%	1.34%	1.38%	1.45%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMF and MOO in my portfolio?

USMF and MOO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMF or MOO?

MOO has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to USMF (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs MOO's -69.53%.

Which ETF is better, USMF or MOO?

On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.67% vs -0.70% for MOO. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMF or MOO?

Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.67% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMF or MOO?

USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMF or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.32% for USMF.

What is the main difference between USMF and MOO?

USMF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.55% for MOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.