USMC vs. NACP
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - USMC tracks the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMC returned 15.68%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
USMC vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.34% return.
USMC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- 21.77%
- 1Y
- 44.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- —
USMC vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 9.11% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -4.89% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.34% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and NACP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between USMC and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
USMC vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
NACP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
USMC
NACP
Financial Services
USMC
NACP
Communication Services
USMC
NACP
Consumer Defensive
USMC
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
NACP
Healthcare
USMC
NACP
Industrials
USMC
NACP
Energy
USMC
NACP
Basic Materials
USMC
-
NACP
Real Estate
USMC
-
NACP
Utilities
USMC
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
NACP
USMC vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMC | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 3.21 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 4.25 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.55 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.69 | -2.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 20.63 | -11.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMC | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.21 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.93 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.93 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
USMC vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, roughly equal to the maximum NACP drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -30.96% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -9.65% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -19.66% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | -27.89% | +3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -5.75% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.19% | +0.50% |
Volatility
USMC vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 2.49%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 4.47% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 11.14% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 14.02% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.47% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 18.70% | -0.45% |
USMC vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMC vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMC and NACP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to USMC (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.17% vs 15.68% for USMC. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.17% return vs 15.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
USMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMC and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer