PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USHYX vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USHYX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USHYX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, USHYX has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 4.67%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.84% annualized return.


USHYX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.04%
6M
1.29%
YTD
1.66%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
4.67%
ALL TIME*
5.88%

IEMG

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.79%
6M
7.82%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
8.84%
ALL TIME*
6.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$833.06M$972.69M$1.09B
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USHYX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USHYX
USAA High Income Fund
1.66%7.22%6.85%13.05%-10.95%5.61%3.74%13.13%-3.52%7.17%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
16.38%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between USHYX and IEMG is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.46

The correlation between USHYX and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USHYX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USHYX
USHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
USHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
USHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USHYX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USHYXIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.33

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

7.16

+3.58

USHYX vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USHYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USHYX and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USHYX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USHYX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHYX and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USHYXIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-38.71%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-13.78%

+11.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.75%

-17.21%

+13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.10%

-33.61%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.55%

-38.71%

+14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-9.76%

+9.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-12.89%

+9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

4.47%

-4.03%

Volatility

USHYX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) is 0.61%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that USHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USHYXIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

8.73%

-8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

21.74%

-19.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

23.71%

-21.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.61%

19.27%

-14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.43%

20.32%

-14.89%

USHYX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USHYX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

USHYX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

USHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than IEMG's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.32%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
USHYX
USAA High Income Fund
6.94%5.48%7.65%7.15%5.89%4.83%5.23%5.78%6.31%5.72%5.91%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


USHYX and IEMG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to USHYX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USHYX dropped -33.59% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

USHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USHYX and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer