PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USHYX vs. USIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USHYX vs. USIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) and USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USHYX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than USIBX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, USHYX has outperformed USIBX with an annualized return of 5.02%, while USIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.99% annualized return.


USHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.70%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
5.02%

USIBX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.78%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USHYX vs. USIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USHYX
USAA High Income Fund
1.55%7.22%6.85%13.05%-10.95%5.61%3.74%13.13%-3.52%7.17%
USIBX
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund
0.27%7.48%2.84%6.74%-12.69%0.85%9.64%11.07%-0.97%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between USHYX and USIBX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1999

0.29

Over the past year, USHYX and USIBX have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USHYX vs. USIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USHYX
USHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
USHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
USHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

USIBX
USIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
USIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
USIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USHYX vs. USIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) and USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USHYXUSIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.68

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

4.98

+9.20

USHYX vs. USIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the USIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USHYX and USIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USHYX vs. USIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USHYX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than USIBX's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHYX and USIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USHYXUSIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-18.49%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-2.87%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.75%

-5.37%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.10%

-18.49%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.55%

-18.49%

-6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.48%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-2.56%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.97%

-0.53%

Volatility

USHYX vs. USIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA High Income Fund (USHYX) is 0.71%, while USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that USHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USHYXUSIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

1.24%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

2.97%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

3.90%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.61%

5.75%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.73%

+0.73%

USHYX vs. USIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USHYX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than USIBX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

USHYX vs. USIBX - Dividend Comparison

USHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than USIBX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USHYX
USAA High Income Fund
6.96%5.48%7.65%7.15%5.89%4.83%5.23%5.78%6.31%5.72%5.91%6.44%
USIBX
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund
4.75%4.56%4.47%3.71%3.17%4.92%6.84%4.93%3.67%3.45%3.86%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


USHYX and USIBX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USIBX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to USHYX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USHYX dropped -33.59% vs USIBX's -18.49%.

USHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USHYX and USIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer