USGG vs. XDSQ
USGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. USGG is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
USGG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USGG
- 1D
- -17.96%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
USGG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
USGG Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF | 64.11% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between USGG and XDSQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USGG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
USGG
XDSQ
USGG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (USGG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USGG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.69 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
USGG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USGG drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGG and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USGG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.74% | -26.06% | -51.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.40% | 0.00% | -32.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.06% | -4.96% | -41.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
USGG vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USGG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 225.33% | 10.56% | +214.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 225.33% | 15.27% | +210.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 225.33% | 15.10% | +210.23% |
USGG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
USGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
USGG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither USGG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USGG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.
USGG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USGG and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for USGG and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer