PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USGDX vs. EDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USGDX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley U.S. Government Securities Trust (USGDX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USGDX achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, USGDX has underperformed EDD with an annualized return of 0.67%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.02% annualized return.


USGDX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-1.93%
6M
-1.83%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
-1.33%
10Y*
0.67%

EDD

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
3.21%
6M
2.25%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USGDX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USGDX
Morgan Stanley U.S. Government Securities Trust
-1.93%13.54%-6.80%4.64%-13.25%-2.18%5.79%7.23%0.08%2.91%
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
3.21%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-7.03%-2.84%25.45%-14.09%16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between USGDX and EDD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2007

0.03

Over the past year, USGDX and EDD have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USGDX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USGDX
USGDX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
USGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
USGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USGDX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley U.S. Government Securities Trust (USGDX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USGDXEDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

3.59

-0.23

USGDX vs. EDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USGDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the EDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USGDX and EDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USGDXEDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.19

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.38

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.28

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.11

+0.37

Drawdowns

USGDX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USGDX drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGDX and EDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGDXEDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.33%

-59.38%

+29.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-17.67%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-17.67%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-32.04%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.33%

-42.70%

+12.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-9.17%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-24.23%

+21.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

5.29%

-2.79%

Volatility

USGDX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley U.S. Government Securities Trust (USGDX) is 3.40%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that USGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGDXEDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

4.69%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.84%

13.02%

-7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.65%

16.07%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

15.32%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.89%

17.71%

-8.82%

USGDX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

USGDX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

USGDX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison

USGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than EDD's 9.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
9.36%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
USGDX
Morgan Stanley U.S. Government Securities Trust
5.03%4.73%5.20%3.09%2.51%2.18%2.79%3.67%3.13%3.11%3.13%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


USGDX and EDD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDD has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to USGDX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGDX dropped -30.33% vs EDD's -59.38%.

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USGDX and EDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer