PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFR.L vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFR.L achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return.


USFR.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.68%
1M
2.84%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.65%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USFR.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD
1.59%4.13%5.41%4.94%2.05%-0.16%0.57%1.47%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.82%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%14.01%

Correlation

The correlation between USFR.L and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFR.L vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFR.L
USFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
USFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USFR.LSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.47

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.72

6.26

+8.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

58.09

15.38

+42.71

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFR.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFR.L and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USFR.LSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

2.64

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.39

0.59

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.86

+0.65

Drawdowns

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFR.L drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR.L and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFR.LSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-33.37%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

-4.61%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.89%

-16.13%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.89%

-16.85%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-3.32%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

1.87%

-1.80%

Volatility

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) is 0.28%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that USFR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFR.LSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

2.69%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

7.65%

-6.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10%

10.95%

-9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.50%

14.38%

-12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

16.71%

-14.87%

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFR.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USFR.L vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

USFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than SCHD's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
USFR.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD
3.99%4.32%5.24%4.58%0.78%0.00%0.57%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFR.L and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.L.

USFR.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHD is Dividend. USFR.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR.L and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFR.L and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer