USFR.L vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
USFR.L and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USFR.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Mar 21, 2019. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. Both USFR.L and USFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USFR.L or USFR.
Key characteristics
| USFR.L | USFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.73% | 4.69% |
| 1Y Return | 5.28% | 5.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.92% | 3.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.46% | 2.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.69 | 14.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.93 | 52.92 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.72 | 12.62 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.21 | 88.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 31.97 | 734.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.16% | 0.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.94% | 0.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -2.99% | -1.36% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFR.L and USFR is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
USFR.L vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with USFR.L having a 4.73% return and USFR slightly lower at 4.69%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USFR.L vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USFR.L and USFR have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USFR.L vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USFR.L vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
USFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, which matches USFR's 5.30% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR.L WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD | 5.27% | 4.58% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 5.30% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.04% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
USFR.L vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFR.L drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR.L and USFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USFR.L vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that USFR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.