USFE vs. ROE
USFE (First Eagle US Equity ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USFE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.
Performance
USFE vs. ROE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USFE
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- YTD
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 31.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFE vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
USFE First Eagle US Equity ETF | 0.43% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFE and ROE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFE vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank
USFE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROE
USFE vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle US Equity ETF (USFE) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USFE | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USFE vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFE drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFE and ROE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFE | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -19.10% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -2.60% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -2.54% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
USFE vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFE | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 14.91% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 15.92% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 15.92% | -3.82% |
USFE vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
USFE vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison
USFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 1.02% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% |
USFE First Eagle US Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFE and ROE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.
ROE has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for USFE.
They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for USFE and 0.49% for ROE.
Find the right allocation for USFE and ROE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer