USEW vs. FJUN
USEW (Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - USEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while FJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. USEW is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.
Performance
USEW vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USEW achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 5.82% return.
USEW
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
USEW vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF | 11.02% | 0.51% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 5.82% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between USEW and FJUN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USEW vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank
USEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FJUN
USEW vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USEW | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USEW vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USEW drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum FJUN drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEW and FJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USEW | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -13.26% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -1.65% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.73% | — |
Volatility
USEW vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USEW | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 5.76% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 10.56% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 10.23% | +2.46% |
USEW vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
USEW vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison
USEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF | 0.55% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USEW and FJUN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
USEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
USEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USEW and 0.85% for FJUN.
Find the right allocation for USEW and FJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer