USERX vs. FGADX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX).
USERX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Jun 30, 1974. FGADX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2010.
Performance
USERX vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USERX vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USERX U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund | 0.68% | 167.44% | 16.75% | 1.44% | -17.44% | -10.80% | 37.16% | 51.34% | -14.24% | 13.07% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 5.78% | 197.29% | 17.98% | 2.20% | -23.24% | -3.76% | 44.60% | 51.87% | -17.89% | 0.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USERX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than FGADX's 5.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USERX having a 17.78% annualized return and FGADX not far ahead at 18.40%.
USERX
- 1D
- 4.50%
- 1M
- -25.94%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 102.52%
- 3Y*
- 43.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.98%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
FGADX
- 1D
- 8.13%
- 1M
- -21.41%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 122.00%
- 3Y*
- 51.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.76%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USERX vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USERX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USERX vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank
USERX
FGADX
USERX vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USERX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.86 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 3.02 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.95 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 14.72 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USERX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.86 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.75 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.27 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between USERX and FGADX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USERX vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison
USERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than FGADX's 9.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USERX U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund | 2.93% | 2.95% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 2.68% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.47% |
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class | 9.28% | 9.81% | 12.51% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 8.83% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 8.38% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USERX vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USERX drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than FGADX's maximum drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USERX and FGADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USERX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.74% | -78.57% | -19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.20% | -31.15% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -48.77% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.45% | -49.27% | +5.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.95% | -21.41% | -23.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.17% | -34.81% | -40.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.81% | 8.36% | +0.45% |
Volatility
USERX vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) is 17.11%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) has a volatility of 18.27%. This indicates that USERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USERX | FGADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.11% | 18.27% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.36% | 35.18% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.08% | 43.06% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 33.13% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.00% | 32.83% | +1.17% |