USEP vs. UAPR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September) and UAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - USEP tracks the S&P 500 Index while UAPR tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USEP returned 7.91%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for UAPR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

USEP vs. UAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEP achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than UAPR's 6.40% return.

USEP

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: —

UAPR

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: 12.70%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USEP vs. UAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
USEP Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September	4.54%	11.75%	12.39%	18.62%	-7.98%	5.73%	7.13%	3.68%
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	6.40%	6.27%	12.38%	10.60%	-5.67%	5.32%	-5.05%	4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between USEP and UAPR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019	0.80

The correlation between USEP and UAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

USEP vs. UAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USEP	UAPR
Technology	38.4%	35.7%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.8%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.5%
Industrials	7.9%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.9%
Energy	3.2%	3.5%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

USEP vs. UAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEP

USEP Risk / Return Rank: 85
USEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
USEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
USEP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
USEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
USEP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

UAPR

UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEP vs. UAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USEP	UAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	3.89	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	6.45	-2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.90	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	11.47	-8.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.46	56.89	-39.43

USEP vs. UAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is lower than the UAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEP and UAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USEP vs. UAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEP drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum UAPR drawdown of -14.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEP and UAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	USEP	UAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-14.61%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-1.11%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.72%	-10.84%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.84%	-10.84%	-1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.65%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-3.29%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.22%	+0.56%

Volatility

USEP vs. UAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) have volatilities of 1.33% and 1.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USEP	UAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.31%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.10%	2.56%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.38%	3.30%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.44%	6.90%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.04%	8.40%	-0.36%

USEP vs. UAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USEP and UAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

USEP vs. UAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither USEP nor UAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.17%
USEP Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USEP and UAPR in my portfolio?

USEP and UAPR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USEP or UAPR?

USEP has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to UAPR (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEP dropped -13.37% vs UAPR's -14.61%.

Which ETF is better, USEP or UAPR?

On 5-year performance, USEP leads with 7.91% vs 6.33% for UAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USEP or UAPR?

Over the 5-year period, USEP has performed better with a 7.91% return vs 6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USEP or UAPR?

USEP and UAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USEP or UAPR?

USEP and UAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between USEP and UAPR?

USEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while UAPR tracks S&P 500.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.