PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEMX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEMX achieves a 22.64% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 55.40% return.


USEMX

1D
1.88%
1M
-2.19%
6M
12.01%
YTD
22.64%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
5.66%

FQEMX

1D
3.19%
1M
-5.96%
6M
33.51%
YTD
55.40%
1Y
99.66%
3Y*
37.72%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USEMX
USAA Emerging Markets Fund
22.64%36.50%5.13%16.07%-20.24%-4.65%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
55.40%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between USEMX and FQEMX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.88

The correlation between USEMX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEMX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USEMX
USEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
USEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
USEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USEMXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.59

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

13.06

-3.39

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEMX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEMX drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEMX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEMXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-34.46%

-30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.23%

-26.96%

+12.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-26.96%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.58%

-19.31%

+9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-10.82%

-8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

7.36%

-3.02%

Volatility

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) is 9.34%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 17.14%. This indicates that USEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEMXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

17.14%

-7.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.03%

35.77%

-14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

37.99%

-14.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

23.95%

-6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

23.95%

-5.70%

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEMX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEMX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

USEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than FQEMX's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
2.05%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USEMX
USAA Emerging Markets Fund
7.12%8.73%3.20%1.83%1.73%0.70%1.04%0.32%1.29%0.33%0.91%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, USEMX and FQEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQEMX has higher volatility (17.14%) compared to USEMX (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEMX dropped -64.84% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEMX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer