PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEMX vs. HLFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEMX achieves a 22.64% return, which is significantly higher than HLFMX's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, USEMX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.32% annualized return.


USEMX

1D
1.88%
1M
-2.19%
6M
12.01%
YTD
22.64%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
5.66%

HLFMX

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.96%
6M
-2.77%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
4.32%
ALL TIME*
1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USEMX
USAA Emerging Markets Fund
22.64%36.50%5.13%16.07%-20.24%-1.22%16.74%22.91%-20.05%33.55%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
5.94%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between USEMX and HLFMX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2008

0.64

The correlation between USEMX and HLFMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEMX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USEMX
USEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
USEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
USEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USEMXHLFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.09

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

2.68

+6.99

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the HLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEMX and HLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEMX drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, roughly equal to the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEMX and HLFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEMXHLFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-63.95%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.23%

-11.09%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-11.79%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-28.37%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-46.61%

+6.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.58%

-3.76%

-5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-19.13%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

4.49%

-0.15%

Volatility

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) at 3.55%. This indicates that USEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEMXHLFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

3.55%

+5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.03%

11.02%

+10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

12.40%

+10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

10.67%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

11.95%

+6.30%

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEMX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEMX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison

USEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than HLFMX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.36%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%
USEMX
USAA Emerging Markets Fund
7.12%8.73%3.20%1.83%1.73%0.70%1.04%0.32%1.29%0.33%0.91%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


USEMX and HLFMX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USEMX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to HLFMX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEMX dropped -64.84% vs HLFMX's -63.95%.

USEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEMX and HLFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer