PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQEMX vs. RNWGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) and American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQEMX achieves a 90.54% return, which is significantly higher than RNWGX's 18.19% return.


FQEMX

1D
5.64%
1M
15.69%
YTD
90.54%
6M
99.18%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
47.88%
5Y*
10Y*

RNWGX

1D
1.48%
1M
5.05%
YTD
18.19%
6M
19.13%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
90.54%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
18.19%28.67%6.88%16.26%-21.77%-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FQEMX and RNWGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.82

The correlation between FQEMX and RNWGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQEMX vs. RNWGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

RNWGX
RNWGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RNWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) and American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQEMXRNWGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.43

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.54

2.79

+5.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.24

11.18

+20.05

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQEMX Sharpe Ratio is 5.03, which is higher than the RNWGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQEMX and RNWGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQEMX drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, roughly equal to the maximum RNWGX drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQEMX and RNWGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQEMXRNWGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.46%

-33.40%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.93%

-13.00%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-15.00%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-8.04%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

3.24%

+1.88%

Volatility

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a higher volatility of 18.86% compared to American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) at 7.64%. This indicates that FQEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNWGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQEMXRNWGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.86%

7.64%

+11.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.35%

14.31%

+15.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.10%

16.19%

+15.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.29%

15.72%

+6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

16.26%

+6.03%

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQEMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RNWGX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQEMX vs. RNWGX - Dividend Comparison

FQEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than RNWGX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.67%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
5.15%6.09%4.11%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.44%4.05%2.71%2.26%1.37%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQEMX and RNWGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (18.86%) compared to RNWGX (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQEMX dropped -34.46% vs RNWGX's -33.40%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.03 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQEMX and RNWGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer