PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEMX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEMX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEMX achieves a 22.64% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 18.42% return. Over the past 10 years, USEMX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.


USEMX

1D
1.88%
1M
-2.19%
6M
12.01%
YTD
22.64%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
5.66%

FPADX

1D
1.63%
1M
-1.88%
6M
9.46%
YTD
18.42%
1Y
36.51%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
8.62%
ALL TIME*
5.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USEMX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USEMX
USAA Emerging Markets Fund
22.64%36.50%5.13%16.07%-20.24%-1.22%16.74%22.91%-20.05%33.55%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
18.42%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-14.65%35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between USEMX and FPADX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.95

The correlation between USEMX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEMX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USEMX
USEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
USEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
USEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USEMX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USEMXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.56

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

8.08

+1.59

USEMX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEMX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USEMX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEMX drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEMX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEMXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-39.16%

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.23%

-13.83%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-16.09%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-34.43%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-39.16%

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.58%

-8.94%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-13.18%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

4.37%

-0.03%

Volatility

USEMX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Emerging Markets Fund (USEMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) have volatilities of 9.34% and 9.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEMXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

9.43%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.03%

20.97%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

22.76%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

18.13%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

18.25%

0.00%

USEMX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEMX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEMX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

USEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than FPADX's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.99%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
USEMX
USAA Emerging Markets Fund
7.12%8.73%3.20%1.83%1.73%0.70%1.04%0.32%1.29%0.33%0.91%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, USEMX and FPADX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FPADX has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to USEMX (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEMX dropped -64.84% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

USEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEMX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer