PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FPADX vs. FZILX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FPADXFZILX
YTD Return13.93%11.47%
1Y Return22.68%22.85%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.46%2.63%
5Y Return (Ann)4.48%6.96%
Sharpe Ratio1.611.68
Sortino Ratio2.302.41
Omega Ratio1.291.32
Calmar Ratio0.701.28
Martin Ratio8.7710.53
Ulcer Index2.57%2.17%
Daily Std Dev14.04%13.63%
Max Drawdown-39.16%-34.37%
Current Drawdown-13.69%-3.14%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FPADX and FZILX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FPADX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than FZILX's 11.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
14.84%
10.97%
FPADX
FZILX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FPADX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
Expense ratio chart for FPADX: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%
Expense ratio chart for FZILX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FPADX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPADX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FPADX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FPADX, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FPADX, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FPADX, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FPADX, currently valued at 8.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.77
FZILX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 10.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.53

FPADX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPADX and FZILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
1.61
1.68
FPADX
FZILX

Dividends

FPADX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than FZILX's 2.67% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.35%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%1.88%1.69%2.47%2.03%2.15%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.67%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.83%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FPADX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FZILX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and FZILX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-13.69%
-3.14%
FPADX
FZILX

Volatility

FPADX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) at 4.49%. This indicates that FPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
6.13%
4.49%
FPADX
FZILX