FPADX vs. FZILX

In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than FZILX's 13.42% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FPADX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPADX and FZILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than FZILX's 2.65% yield.

The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FZILX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and FZILX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.