USDX vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

USDX (SGI Enhanced Core ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. USDX is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past year, USDX returned 6.47% vs 39.16% for IWM. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. USDX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

USDX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USDX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.22% return.

USDX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 6.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 19.22%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 39.16%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF	2.26%	6.25%	6.87%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	19.22%	12.66%	10.50%

Correlation

The correlation between USDX and IWM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	-0.01

USDX vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USDX	IWM
Financial Services	84.7%	15.6%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Communication Services	-	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.1%
Energy	-	5.8%
Healthcare	-	16.1%
Industrials	-	17.2%
Real Estate	-	5.6%
Technology	-	19.5%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

USDX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDX

USDX Risk / Return Rank: 96
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 72
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USDX	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.24	1.99	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.13	2.75	+2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.33	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.93	3.57	+3.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	45.42	12.63	+32.79

USDX vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDX and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USDX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDX drawdown since its inception was -0.94%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDX and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	USDX	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-59.05%	+58.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.94%	-11.03%	+10.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-10.76%	+10.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.14%	3.12%	-2.98%

Volatility

USDX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) is 1.04%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that USDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USDX	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	7.16%	-6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.82%	14.29%	-12.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	19.73%	-17.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.71%	22.61%	-20.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.71%	23.08%	-21.37%

USDX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

USDX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

USDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than IWM's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.87%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF	5.88%	5.88%	4.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USDX and IWM in my portfolio?

USDX and IWM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USDX or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to USDX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USDX dropped -0.94% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, USDX or IWM?

On 1-year performance, IWM leads with 39.16% vs 6.47% for USDX. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, USDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USDX or IWM?

Over the 1-year period, IWM has performed better with a 39.16% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USDX or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USDX or IWM?

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 0.87% for IWM.

What is the main difference between USDX and IWM?

USDX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for USDX and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.