PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USDV.L vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USDV.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USDV.L is traded in GBP, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USDV.L achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, USDV.L has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 9.84%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.55% annualized return.


USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.65%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%

VT

1D
0.00%
1M
3.57%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.41%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
13.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDV.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%26.74%-2.72%19.69%1.49%6.73%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
10.30%13.71%18.53%15.92%-8.25%19.39%13.16%21.99%-4.41%13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between USDV.L and VT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between USDV.L and VT has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USDV.L vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USDV.L
VT

Industrials

17.5%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%
4.8%

Utilities

14.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

11.5%
15.9%

Technology

8.9%
27.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
9.5%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.4%

Energy

4.5%
4.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.3%

Industrials

USDV.L
17.5%
VT
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

USDV.L
17.0%
VT
4.8%

Utilities

USDV.L
14.8%
VT
2.7%

Financial Services

USDV.L
11.5%
VT
15.9%

Technology

USDV.L
8.9%
VT
27.8%

Basic Materials

USDV.L
6.4%
VT
4.2%

Healthcare

USDV.L
6.2%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USDV.L
5.2%
VT
9.5%

Real Estate

USDV.L
4.6%
VT
2.4%

Energy

USDV.L
4.5%
VT
4.3%

Communication Services

USDV.L
3.5%
VT
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USDV.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDV.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDV.LVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.53

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

4.16

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

17.23

-11.82

USDV.L vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDV.L and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDV.LVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.77

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.87

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.82

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.60

+0.24

Drawdowns

USDV.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDV.LVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-31.81%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-7.55%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-17.91%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-17.91%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

-26.93%

-0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-0.15%

-3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-4.54%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.82%

+0.76%

Volatility

USDV.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) is 2.53%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that USDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDV.LVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

2.74%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

8.62%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

11.33%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

14.11%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

16.54%

-1.21%

USDV.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

USDV.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than VT's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.64%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


USDV.L and VT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

USDV.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VT is Global Equities. USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USDV.L and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer