PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USD vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USD vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 50.25% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 54.19%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.52% annualized return.


USD

1D
1.44%
1M
-16.99%
6M
34.80%
YTD
50.25%
1Y
84.35%
3Y*
87.71%
5Y*
55.02%
10Y*
54.19%
ALL TIME*
28.07%

IDMO

1D
0.10%
1M
1.32%
6M
6.43%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
15.47%
10Y*
12.52%
ALL TIME*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.05M$20.41M$22.89M
$68.86M$72.62M$95.81M

USD vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
50.25%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%81.72%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
10.66%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between USD and IDMO is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.43

The correlation between USD and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USD vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USD
IDMO

Technology

31.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

29.8%
12.0%

Energy

0.0%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Industrials

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Technology

USD
31.1%
IDMO
0.5%

Financial Services

USD
29.8%
IDMO
12.0%

Energy

USD
0.0%
IDMO
0.6%

Basic Materials

USD

-

IDMO
4.6%

Communication Services

USD

-

IDMO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USD

-

IDMO
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

USD

-

IDMO
0.4%

Healthcare

USD

-

IDMO
0.4%

Industrials

USD

-

IDMO
1.1%

Real Estate

USD

-

IDMO
0.3%

Utilities

USD

-

IDMO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USD vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USD vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USDIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.95

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

7.47

-1.25

USD vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USD Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USD and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USD vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-39.38%

-49.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.33%

-12.31%

-27.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.46%

-12.65%

-51.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.85%

-27.07%

-50.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.85%

-31.34%

-46.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.59%

-1.81%

-28.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-9.68%

-22.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.62%

3.22%

+10.40%

Volatility

USD vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 28.19% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 7.12%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.19%

7.12%

+21.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.13%

17.57%

+43.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.80%

19.20%

+54.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.73%

18.24%

+60.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.38%

17.97%

+52.41%

USD vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

USD vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.39%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


USD and IDMO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (28.19%) compared to IDMO (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, USD leads with 54.19% vs 12.52% for IDMO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 54.19% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.39% for USD.

USD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USD and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer