USD vs. FAS
USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%) while FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USD returned 60.21%/yr vs 21.20%/yr for FAS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.
Performance
USD vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 86.87% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed FAS with an annualized return of 60.21%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively lower 21.20% annualized return.
USD
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 86.87%
- 6M
- 97.77%
- 1Y
- 207.86%
- 3Y*
- 111.11%
- 5Y*
- 65.02%
- 10Y*
- 60.21%
FAS
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 12.77%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- 1Y
- 1.34%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
USD vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 86.87% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -13.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between USD and FAS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USD and FAS has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USD vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USD
FAS
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
USD
FAS
Technology
USD
FAS
Energy
USD
FAS
-
Basic Materials
USD
-
FAS
-
Communication Services
USD
-
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
USD
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
USD
-
FAS
-
Healthcare
USD
-
FAS
-
Industrials
USD
-
FAS
Real Estate
USD
-
FAS
-
Utilities
USD
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USD vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
USD
FAS
USD vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USD | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.04 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.58 | 0.03 | +6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.43 | 0.08 | +18.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USD vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USD | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -91.61% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.80% | -40.88% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.46% | -43.10% | -21.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.85% | -66.88% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.85% | -85.99% | +8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.67% | -20.63% | +6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -31.12% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.34% | 17.97% | -6.63% |
Volatility
USD vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 29.56% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.45%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USD | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.56% | 12.45% | +17.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.44% | 33.46% | +18.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.34% | 43.61% | +21.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.19% | 55.59% | +21.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.61% | 61.33% | +8.28% |
USD vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
USD vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than FAS's 9.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.64% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USD and FAS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (29.56%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 60.21% vs 21.20% for FAS. On fees, USD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 60.21% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.25% for USD.
USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 1.00% for FAS.
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USD and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer