PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCL vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.


USCL

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
3.33%
6M
1.99%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCL vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USCL and WNTR is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCL vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL
USCL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
USCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCLWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.29

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

5.85

-0.67

USCL vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCL vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCLWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-42.65%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-42.65%

+32.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-9.88%

+5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-20.93%

+18.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

16.70%

-14.02%

Volatility

USCL vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) is 4.89%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that USCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCLWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

17.54%

-12.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

45.99%

-36.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

52.83%

-40.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

53.10%

-38.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

53.10%

-38.17%

USCL vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCL vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
USCL
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
1.13%1.10%1.18%0.85%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
96.66%58.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCL and WNTR have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to USCL (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 13.85% for USCL. On fees, USCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USCL has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 1.13% for USCL.

USCL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USCL and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCL and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer