USCL vs. OILK
USCL (Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USCL returned 20.82% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. USCL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
USCL vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
USCL
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
USCL vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 7.04% | 14.26% | 27.04% | 12.71% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | 8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between USCL and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
USCL vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USCL
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
USCL
OILK
-
Financial Services
USCL
OILK
-
Communication Services
USCL
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
USCL
OILK
Healthcare
USCL
OILK
-
Industrials
USCL
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
USCL
OILK
-
Energy
USCL
OILK
-
Utilities
USCL
OILK
-
Real Estate
USCL
OILK
-
Basic Materials
USCL
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCL vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
USCL
OILK
USCL vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.42 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 6.91 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.06 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.12 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
USCL vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -83.76% | +64.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -17.35% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -3.66% | +2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -32.61% | +30.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 8.56% | -5.98% |
Volatility
USCL vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) is 2.79%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that USCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 10.44% | -7.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 23.26% | -14.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 28.75% | -16.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 30.12% | -15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 35.97% | -21.13% |
USCL vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
USCL vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 1.07% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCL and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to USCL (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 20.82% for USCL. On fees, USCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USCL has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 20.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.07% for USCL.
USCL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. USCL tracks MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USCL and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCL and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer