PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCI vs. SOYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCI vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCI achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than SOYB's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, USCI has outperformed SOYB with an annualized return of 8.41%, while SOYB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.13% annualized return.


USCI

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.05%
6M
22.70%
YTD
23.68%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
19.25%
10Y*
8.41%

SOYB

1D
0.28%
1M
4.35%
6M
13.74%
YTD
15.14%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
-3.42%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCI vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
23.68%17.63%17.24%-0.00%29.47%33.07%-11.47%-1.68%-11.76%6.32%
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
15.14%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between USCI and SOYB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between USCI and SOYB has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCI vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCI
USCI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCI vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCISOYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.92

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

5.02

+3.48

USCI vs. SOYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the SOYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCI and SOYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCI vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCI drawdown since its inception was -66.41%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCI and SOYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCISOYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.41%

-53.76%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-8.78%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.01%

-31.01%

+19.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-31.01%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

-33.93%

-11.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.52%

-14.12%

+7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-25.69%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.36%

+0.15%

Volatility

USCI vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison

United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) at 4.42%. This indicates that USCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCISOYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

4.42%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

9.47%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

12.93%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

17.14%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.80%

-0.92%

USCI vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SOYB's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCI vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison

Neither USCI nor SOYB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USCI and SOYB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCI has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SOYB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCI dropped -66.41% vs SOYB's -53.76%.

On 10-year performance, USCI leads with 8.41% vs 2.13% for SOYB. On fees, USCI is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USCI has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCI is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.

USCI and SOYB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

USCI is categorized as Commodities, while SOYB is Agricultural Commodities. USCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return, while SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. They also come from different issuers: United States Commodity Funds and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for USCI and 1.88% for SOYB.

USCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCI and SOYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer