PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCI vs. INFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCI vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCI achieves a 28.22% return, which is significantly higher than INFL's 17.21% return.


USCI

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
28.22%
6M
26.35%
1Y
40.33%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
8.86%

INFL

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
17.21%
6M
17.82%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCI vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
28.22%17.63%17.24%-0.00%29.47%29.37%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
17.21%18.30%23.34%1.62%2.65%24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USCI and INFL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.48

The correlation between USCI and INFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCI vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCI
USCI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
USCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCI vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCIINFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

2.81

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.18

7.68

+8.50

USCI vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCI and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCIINFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.52

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.75

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.91

-0.61

Drawdowns

USCI vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCI drawdown since its inception was -66.41%, which is greater than INFL's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCI and INFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCIINFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.41%

-21.30%

-45.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.36%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.01%

-15.56%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-21.30%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-5.51%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.51%

-5.10%

-24.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.06%

-0.56%

Volatility

USCI vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 3.60%. This indicates that USCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCIINFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.60%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

12.32%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

15.52%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

17.71%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

17.64%

-1.79%

USCI vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCI vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.91%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCI and INFL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCI has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to INFL (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCI dropped -66.41% vs INFL's -21.30%.

On 5-year performance, USCI leads with 19.28% vs 13.12% for INFL. On fees, INFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USCI has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.

INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.

USCI is categorized as Commodities, while INFL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for USCI and 0.85% for INFL.

USCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCI and INFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer