PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCF vs. KEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USCF vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USCF vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USCF
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
1.34%15.71%5.84%
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
12.12%22.76%2.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCF achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than KEAT's 12.12% return.


USCF

1D
1.31%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.34%
6M
3.72%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KEAT

1D
1.21%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
12.12%
6M
16.70%
1Y
29.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USCF vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USCF vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCF
USCF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
USCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

KEAT
KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCF vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCFKEATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.49

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

3.22

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.48

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

4.05

-3.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

17.08

-12.59

USCF vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCF and KEAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCFKEATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.49

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.81

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between USCF and KEAT is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

USCF vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

USCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than KEAT's 2.37% yield.


TTM20252024
USCF
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
1.81%1.84%1.19%
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
2.37%2.48%1.72%

Drawdowns

USCF vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCF and KEAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USCFKEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-7.45%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-7.38%

-6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-3.27%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-1.38%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.77%

+1.46%

Volatility

USCF vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Keating Active ETF (KEAT) at 3.76%. This indicates that USCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USCFKEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

3.76%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

8.66%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

12.05%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

10.40%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

10.40%

+5.12%