USCA vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USCA tracks the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USCA returned 13.94% vs 51.71% for NRSH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

USCA vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 43.10% return.

USCA

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 13.94%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 5.75%
• YTD: 43.10%
• 6M: 39.14%
• 1Y: 51.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	3.32%	14.24%	27.24%	4.85%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	43.10%	12.95%	-6.17%	9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and NRSH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.63

The correlation between USCA and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	NRSH
Technology	41.9%	36.7%
Communication Services	12.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	-
Healthcare	9.0%	-
Financial Services	8.9%	-
Industrials	6.6%	57.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	-
Energy	1.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.8%	5.4%
Utilities	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

USCA vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 33
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 74
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USCA	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.00	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.63	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.33	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	4.75	-3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.21	14.41	-9.20

USCA vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USCA vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-24.01%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-10.94%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	-3.52%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-5.56%	+3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	3.60%	-0.92%

Volatility

USCA vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 4.74%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	10.51%	-5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	21.71%	-11.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	26.00%	-13.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.84%	22.06%	-7.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.84%	22.06%	-7.22%

USCA vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCA vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than NRSH's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.29%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.15%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and NRSH in my portfolio?

USCA and NRSH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to USCA (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 51.71% vs 13.94% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 51.71% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or NRSH?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or NRSH?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.29% for NRSH.

What is the main difference between USCA and NRSH?

USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.