USCA vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USCA is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Over the past year, USCA returned 21.47% vs 45.16% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

USCA vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.88% return.

USCA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 18.88%
• 6M: 20.88%
• 1Y: 45.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	7.54%	14.24%	27.24%	15.36%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	18.88%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and BLCR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.89

The correlation between USCA and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	BLCR
Technology	29.4%	35.7%
Financial Services	13.6%	12.1%
Communication Services	12.7%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	10.9%
Healthcare	10.7%	7.6%
Industrials	7.0%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.5%	2.2%
Utilities	2.4%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.2%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 50
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCA	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.92	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.88	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.50	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	4.42	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	20.96	-12.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCA vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCA	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.92	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	1.88	-0.38

Drawdowns

USCA vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-21.29%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-10.26%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.94%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-2.19%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	2.16%	+0.42%

Volatility

USCA vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 2.85%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	4.33%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	12.26%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	15.55%	-3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	17.46%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	17.46%	-2.71%

USCA vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCA vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.08%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and BLCR in my portfolio?

USCA and BLCR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to USCA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 45.16% vs 21.47% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 45.16% return vs 21.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or BLCR?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or BLCR?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between USCA and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.